Journal article icon

Journal article

Integration of multi-objective spatial optimization and data-driven interpretation to direct the city-wide sustainable promotion of building-based decentralized water technologies

Abstract:
Decentralized water technologies such as rainwater harvesting (RWH) and greywater recycling (GWR) can supplement centralized urban water systems, helping reduce water withdrawal and improve water reliability. These benefits only emerge when decentralized water technologies are widely implemented. Several decision-supporting frameworks have been developed to identify suitable locations for deploying decentralized water technologies in a city. Yet, the support remains inadequate regarding: (1) the evaluation of the trade-off between environmental benefits and economic costs in selecting locations, and (2) the interpretation of the transition of optimal selections from low to high investment to assist in the promotion. This study presents an integrated analytic framework that combines multi-objective optimization and data-driven interpretation to direct the city-wide sustainable promotion of building-based decentralized water technologies. We select single-family houses in the city of Boston and apply the framework to study the promotion of building-based RWH and GWR. The framework starts with multi-objective spatial optimization to identify the non-dominant optimal selections (i.e., Pareto-front) of houses and technologies at the trade-off between maximizing energy savings and minimizing financial investment. Then, we evaluate the impact of the initial selection setting and the community-based maximum water saving constraint on the Pareto-optimal front. The spatial optimization shows that RWH is much more applicable than GWR for single-family house communities in Boston. When interpreting the Pareto-front, two clusters of census blocks stand out based on the change in the percentages of houses selected to invest RWH and GWR in each census block along with different investment levels. One cluster demonstrates its priority of being first selected to deploy RWH. Using Random Forest, critical features explain why one cluster should be selected first for promotion, including the larger demand for non-potable water use, longer distance from the centralized facilities, and larger rooftop for collecting rainwater. Finally, we discuss possible future improvements of the proposed spatial optimization and interpretation framework. Overall, our study can be useful to promote decentralized water technologies in cities.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.watres.2022.118880

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
SOGE
Sub department:
Environmental Change Institute
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8163-6227
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-1893-0797
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2939-6016
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4151-5065


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/021nxhr62
Grant:
2020B1212030005


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Water Research More from this journal
Volume:
222
Article number:
118880
Place of publication:
England
Publication date:
2022-07-19
Acceptance date:
2022-07-17
DOI:
EISSN:
1879-2448
ISSN:
0043-1354
Pmid:
35933811


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2380078
Local pid:
pubs:2380078
Deposit date:
2026-03-17
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP