Journal article icon

Journal article

What to teach parents to reduce disruptive child behavior: two meta-analyses of parenting program components

Abstract:
Objective: Parenting programs are the recommended strategy for the prevention and treatment of disruptive child behavior. Similar to most psychosocial interventions, it is unknown which components of parenting programs (i.e., parenting techniques taught) actually contribute to program effects. Identifying what parents need to be taught to reduce disruptive child behavior can optimize intervention strategies, and refine theories on how parenting shapes disruptive child behavior. Method: In two meta-analyses, we updated the evidence-base for effectiveness of parenting programs delivered at various levels of prevention and treatment of disruptive behavior. We searched six databases (e.g., PsycINFO, MEDLINE) for randomized trials and coded the parenting techniques taught in each program. We identified the techniques associated with program effects in general, and for prevention versus treatment, and immediate versus longer-term effects, specifically. Results: Parenting program effects on disruptive behavior gradually increased per level of prevention (universal d=0.27, selective d=0.33, indicated d=0.65) and treatment (d=0.79) (Meta-Analysis 1: 154 trials, 398 effect sizes). Three out of 26 parenting techniques were associated with stronger program effects: positive reinforcement, praise in particular, and natural/logical consequences. Several additional techniques (e.g., relationship building and parental selfmanagement) were associated with stronger effects in treatment, but weaker effects in prevention. No techniques were associated with stronger longer-term effects (Meta-Analysis 2: 42 trials, 157 effect sizes). Conclusion: Positive reinforcement and nonviolent disciplining techniques (e.g., natural/logical consequences) seem key parenting program techniques to reduce disruptive child behavior. Additional techniques (e.g., parental self-management skills) might improve program effects in treatment, but not in prevention.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.jaac.2018.07.900

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Social Sciences Division
Department:
Social Policy & Intervention
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Social Policy & Intervention
Oxford college:
Wolfson College
Role:
Author



Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry More from this journal
Volume:
58
Issue:
2
Pages:
180-190
Publication date:
2018-11-26
Acceptance date:
2018-08-17
DOI:
EISSN:
1527-5418
ISSN:
0890-8567


Pubs id:
pubs:908264
UUID:
uuid:4e1f9429-c746-4ccd-bde9-eca059b4dade
Local pid:
pubs:908264
Source identifiers:
908264
Deposit date:
2018-08-17
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP