Journal article
William Petty, the multiplication of mankind, and demographic discourse in seventeenth-century England
- Abstract:
- In the 1650ss, after a century of increase, the population of England stopped growing. It was not to increase substantially again before 1750. Over the same interval, and not wholly coincidentally, scholars and theologians were trying to defend the orthodox account of how global population had increased since the Creation and must continue to do so, and the first political arithmeticians were trying to measure and analyse demographic change. This article seeks to throw fresh light on this many-sided discourse by examining William Petty’s attempt to write an account of the multiplication of mankind, and the reasons why he failed to complete it. It focuses particularly on Petty’s part in developing methods of measuring population density which highlighted the potential for future growth, and on the equally important demonstration by John Graunt that high and rising mortality in cities was hindering population growth in reality. As Petty’s cousin Robert Southwell pointed out, Graunt’s ‘rule of mortality’ was wholly incompatible with any coherent account of the future multiplication of mankind. At the end of this particular discourse, newly discovered facts about demography triumphed over the presuppositions of divinity.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 336.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/S0018246X17000358
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Historical Journal More from this journal
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 301-325
- Publication date:
- 2017-12-04
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-08-13
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1469-5103
- ISSN:
-
0018-246X
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:856840
- UUID:
-
uuid:4d43b0f8-b662-4497-a327-26cf533db0b4
- Local pid:
-
pubs:856840
- Source identifiers:
-
856840
- Deposit date:
-
2018-06-09
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Cambridge University Press
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- © Cambridge University Press 2017. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X17000358
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record