Preprint icon

Preprint

A scoping review of nature-based programmes in schools for mental health and wellbeing in young people

Abstract:
Background: Adolescent mental health difficulties are rising in the UK, yet school-based provision is limited. Nature-based Programmes (NbPs) are increasingly promoted as alternative or supplementary interventions for Mental Health and Wellbeing (MHWB), but evidence in secondary schools is under-explored.

Aim: In this scoping review, we map existing NbPs in secondary school contexts; identify reported outcomes for mental health, wellbeing, and learning; and assess evidence quality for NbPs in secondary-school provision.

Methods: We followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines (protocol: https://osf.io/qczas), searching five databases and the grey literature. Eligible studies reported school-based NbPs for students aged 10–18. The review process included screening, data extraction, and appraisal (using MMAT), and was co-produced with policymakers, educators, and young people.

Results: From 17,723 records, 22 studies were included. NbPs encompassed school gardening, outdoor education, conservation, forest pedagogy, recreation in nature, and passive nature engagements. Most NbPs were delivered weekly on school grounds or in local greenspaces. Reported MHWB outcomes included reduced anxiety and stress, improved selfesteem and resilience, enhanced prosocial behaviour and school connectedness, and enhanced nature connectedness. Evidence for academic outcomes was mixed, with modest gains in science engagement and arithmetic but little evidence of broader academic performance benefits. Overall study quality was moderate, with small samples, limited use of control groups, and heterogeneity in outcome metrics.

Conclusion: NbPs show promise for supporting adolescent MHWB in secondary schools, with school and nature connectedness emerging as potential mediators. However, evidence for cognitive and academic gains remains limited. In future, robust, UK-based Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) with standardised outcome measures are needed to assess efficacy of NbPs.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Not peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Preprint server copy:
10.31234/osf.io/rf5xd_v1

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Oxford college:
Jesus College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5460-4454
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0004-5746-9755
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Education
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0009-0462-2716
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
SOGE
Oxford college:
Regent's Park College
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4497-3587


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/02b5d8509
Grant:
NE/W004976/1
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/015ah0c92
Grant:
NIHR203316


Preprint server:
PsyArXiv
Publication date:
2025-12-09
DOI:


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2327015
Local pid:
pubs:2327015
Deposit date:
2025-11-14
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP