Journal article
Using prosodic cues to identify dialogue acts: methodological challenges
- Abstract:
-
This paper addresses the role of prosodic and phonetic features in talk, focussing on how to identify competitive overlaps in conversations. It has previously been claimed that turn competition may be distinguishable from non-competitive overlaps, based on phonetic/prosodic features alone. We test this hypothesis on recordings from a UK based call centre, combining a conversation analytic approach with quantitative methods using a coding scheme. Our long-term aim is to develop large-scale methods operationalising what we know about conversational sequence and social actions into speech technological applications.
Our findings show that, although there is a tendency for competitive overlaps to be more prominent in terms of loudness and pitch features than non-competitive overlaps, this difference is not sufficient to reliably identify turn competitions from the speech signal itself. We discuss the findings in relation to observations made in individual examples, and conclude by highlighting some of the methodological challenges of applying findings from the linguistic and conversation analytic literature to speech technologies.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 379.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1515/text-2017-0007
Authors
- Publisher:
- De Gruyter
- Journal:
- Talk & Text More from this journal
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 3
- Publication date:
- 2017-04-25
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-01-22
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1860-7349
- ISSN:
-
1860-7330
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:673054
- UUID:
-
uuid:4c6efb46-f4e5-4c1b-9a72-9dd607a02b7e
- Local pid:
-
pubs:673054
- Source identifiers:
-
673054
- Deposit date:
-
2017-01-25
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- © 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is available online from De Gruyter at: 10.1515/text-2017-0007
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record