Journal article
Intermestic security challenges: managing transnational bonds
- Abstract:
- Intermestic security challenges arise when there is concern in a country that a dissatisfied minority relies on transnational bonds with a foreign kin-group for support. They result from ethnic and/or ideological affinities translating into foreign support seen as problematic, and they are aggravated when the dissatisfied minority is able to raise territorial claims. This can lead to complications not only in domestic politics but also in international relations (hence, the term ‘intermestic’). Intermestic challenges can escalate into civil war and other political calamities, but they can also be managed by governments. This article develops a theoretical model and discusses it with regard to China and its Muslim-majority neighboring countries. To the west of China, transnational bonds of Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang with co-ethnics and coreligionists in Central Asia, Pakistan, and Afghanistan complicate Chinese relations with those countries. In the southeast, transnational bonds of ethnic Chinese in Indonesia and Malaysia with their ancestral homeland have complicated Indonesian and Malaysian relations with China. While the cases have followed different trajectories, Beijing has managed either challenge rather successfully. The theoretical model developed and the management strategies discussed are likely to be useful in other contexts.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 322.7KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/eis.2017.19
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- European Journal of International Security More from this journal
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 162-186
- Publication date:
- 2018-01-09
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-10-31
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2057-5645
- ISSN:
-
2057-5637
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:740651
- UUID:
-
uuid:4b6bd4bd-38cd-499f-a941-4f1572be4895
- Local pid:
-
pubs:740651
- Source identifiers:
-
740651
- Deposit date:
-
2017-10-31
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- © British International Studies Association 2018
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: 10.1017/eis.2017.19
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record