Working paper
Effect of spacing on wood density of Pinus patula and Cupressus lusitanica
- Abstract:
-
Samples of Pinus patula and Cupressus lusitanica grown with three different spacings at Rongai in Northern Tanzania were examined to determine their wood density. Spacing effected the height and diameter of P. patula, but only the diameter of C. lusitanica. Both species yielded wood with a density around 400 kg m-3 (oven dry weight/green volume) and spacing had no appreciable influence. The wood of P. patula included a much wider range of density than that of C. lusitanica.
The original project document laid down five objectives of which the first dealt with wood density and its variations between and within the two species studied and the other four dealt with the pulping and paper making properties of the species. The X-ray densitometry carried out by OFI has dealt only with objective 1, whereas the pulping work is being done at the University of North Wales, Bangor.
Objective 1 has been achieved in that the variation of wood density has been studied in detail and the results analysed to give the conclusions on page 4 of this report. These findings will be very useful in comparing density with pulping properties, particularly pulp strengths, when the work at Bangor has been completed.
- Publication status:
- Published
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 4.2MB, Terms of use)
-
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford
- Series:
- O.F.I. Occasional papers
- Publication date:
- 1995-01-01
- ISSN:
-
0269-5790
- Paper number:
- 48
- ISBN:
- 0850741335
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- UUID:
-
uuid:4a850c01-3efc-49fe-82e2-2fe70bcaa688
- Local pid:
-
ftry:10111
- Deposit date:
-
2015-02-18
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- University of Oxford
- Copyright date:
- 1995
- Notes:
- This document has been digitised by the Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford as part of the Oxford Digital Library for Forestry (ODLF) project. Digitisation of this document has been made possible through the support of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. The original contents of this document remain the copyright of the University of Oxford (http://www.ox.ac.uk/).
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record