Journal article icon

Journal article

A multimethod study of NHS 111 online

Abstract:
Background: NHS 111 online offers 24-hour access to health assessment and triage.Objectives: this study examined pathways to care, differential access and use, and workforce impacts of NHS 111 online. This study compared NHS 111 with Healthdirect (Haymarket, Australia) virtual triage.Design: interviews with 80 staff and stakeholders in English primary, urgent and emergency care, and 41 staff and stakeholders associated with Healthdirect. A survey of 2754 respondents, of whom 1137 (41.3%) had used NHS 111 online and 1617 (58.7%) had not.Results: NHS 111 online is one of several digital health-care technologies and was not differentiated from the NHS 111 telephone service or well understood. There is a similar lack of awareness of Healthdirect virtual triage. NHS 111 and Healthdirect virtual triage are perceived as creating additional work for health-care staff and inappropriate demand for some health services, especially emergency care. One-third of survey respondents reported that they had not used any NHS 111 service (telephone or online). Older people and those with less educational qualifications are less likely to use NHS 111 online. Respondents who had used NHS 111 online reported more use of other urgent care services and make more cumulative use of services than those who had not used NHS 111 online. Users of NHS 111 online had higher levels of self-reported eHealth literacy. There were differences in reported preferences for using NHS 111 online for different symptom presentations.Conclusions: greater clarity about what the NHS 111 online service offers would allow better signposting and reduce confusion. Generic NHS 111 services are perceived as creating additional work in the primary, urgent and emergency care system. There are differences in eHealth literacy between users and those who have not used NHS 111 online, and this suggests that ‘digital first’ policies may increase health inequalitie
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3310/ytrr9821

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5006-4438
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6872-5011
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9923-3116
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-6902-4578
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7455-2244


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100002001
Grant:
NIHR127590


Publisher:
NIHR Journals Library
Journal:
Health and Social Care Delivery Research More from this journal
Volume:
11
Issue:
5
Pages:
1-104
Publication date:
2023-06-01
DOI:
EISSN:
2755-0079
ISSN:
2755-0060


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1493912
Local pid:
pubs:1493912
Source identifiers:
W4384661252
Deposit date:
2026-05-11
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP