Journal article
An empirical assessment of differential privacy in real-world observational data: a case-control study of asthma exacerbation in UK Biobank linked with electronic health records
- Abstract:
- Objectives: Electronic health records (EHRs) provide substantial resources for observational studies, yet present significant challenges in safeguarding patient privacy while maintaining research quality. Differential privacy (DP) offers a quantifiable privacy guarantee; however, its impact on observational studies remains underexplored. We empirically evaluated the effects of DP across varying values of its privacy parameter, epsilon, on case-control analysis outcomes using EHR data. This study aims to inform DP parameter selection and examines the influence of study characteristics on differentially private observational studies. Materials and Methods: We assessed the effects of DP on a case-control study of 1-year asthma exacerbations, including 22 165 participants with a history of asthma from UK Biobank linked to EHR data. Odds ratios (ORs) for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities were analyzed using adjusted and propensity score-matched models across epsilon values. Results: DP influenced the magnitude, direction, and statistical significance of ORs, occasionally resembling patterns of misclassification, residual confounding, and false-positive bias. Rare and imbalanced covariates showed greater OR variability, especially in matched studies. Epsilons smaller than ln(2) led to noticeable OR fluctuations. Discussion: The impact of DP on ORs and selection of an optimal epsilon depends on sample size, covariate prevalence, confounders, case-to-control ratios in propensity score matching, mitigation of random seed p-hacking, and trust models. Conclusion: The effects of DP on ORs are highly context-dependent. In this study, epsilon values below ln(2) led to unstable ORs across random seeds. Averaging results or using predetermined seeds may help reduce variability and mitigate p-hacking.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.7MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/jamia/ocaf090
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- A Scholarly Journal of Informatics in Health and Biomedicine More from this journal
- Article number:
- ocaf090
- Publication date:
- 2025-06-18
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-06-02
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1527-974X
- ISSN:
-
1067-5027
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Source identifiers:
-
3060452
- Deposit date:
-
2025-06-27
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record