Journal article
Budget monitoring, accountability practices and their influence on the efficiency of county health systems in Kenya
- Abstract:
- Public Finance Management (PFM) practices influence the attainment of health system goals. PFM processes are implemented within the budget cycle which entails the formulation, execution, and monitoring of government budgets. Budget monitoring and accountability actors, structures, and processes are important in improving the efficiency of health systems. This study examined how the budget monitoring and accountability processes influence the efficiency of county health systems in KenyaWe conducted a qualitative case study of four counties in Kenya selected based on their relative technical efficiency. We collected data using in-depth interviews with health and finance stakeholders (n = 70), and document reviews. We analyzed data using a thematic approach, informed by our study conceptual framework. We found that weak budget monitoring and accountability mechanisms compromised county health system efficiency by a) weakening the effective implementation of the budget formulation and execution steps of the budget cycle, b) enabling the misappropriation of public resources, and c) limiting evidence-informed decision-making by weakening feedback that would be provided by effective monitoring and accountability. Devolution meant that accountability actors were closer to implementation actors which promoted timely problem solving and the relevance of solutions. Internal audit practices were supportive and provided useful feedback to health system managers that facilitated improvements in budget formulation and execution. The efficiency of county health systems can be improved by strengthening the budget monitoring and accountability processes. This can be achieved by increasing the population's budget literacy, supporting participatory budgeting, synchronizing performance and financial accountability, implementing the existent budget monitoring and accountability mechanisms, rewarding efficiency, and sanctioning inefficiency
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 793.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001908
Authors
+ MRC/DFID/Wellcome Trust Health Systems Research Initiative
More from this funder
- Grant:
- MR/R01373X/1
- Publisher:
- Public Library of Science
- Journal:
- PLOS Global Public Health More from this journal
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 11
- Pages:
- e0001908-e0001908
- Publication date:
- 2023-11-16
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2767-3375
- ISSN:
-
2767-3375
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1569936
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1569936
- Source identifiers:
-
W4388734530
- Deposit date:
-
2026-06-01
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2023
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record