Journal article
Lucretian subversion: Animal speech and misplaced wonder in Paradise Lost 9.549-66
- Abstract:
- The language used by the Satanic serpent in his encounter with Eve in Book 9 of Paradise Lost is key to Eve's subsequent temptation and eventual Fall. The first danger of the temptation scene, as John Leonard has argued, lies in her being drawn into a debate about the nature of the serpent's speech: “[T]he serpent speaks specifically about his speaking and attributes this supposedly new power to some as yet unspecified fruit” (141). He not only provides Eve with an account of how he came to possess the human gift of language, but also outlines how he came to possess the cognitive faculties that underlie it (PL 9.598–601). In what follows, I argue that the scene functions as a counter‐didactic experience for Eve, specifically in its allusive reworking of a passage on the origins of language in the Roman Epicurean poet Lucretius's didactic poem On the Nature of Things (De Rerum Natura, henceforth DRN). The key to the success of Eve's temptation in Book 9 is the way the exchange employs and subverts elements of this Lucretian account of language in DRN 5, announcing the confusion of Eve's cognitive faculties, and building the language of misplaced wonder that subverts the didactic message of Lucretius's poem.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 152.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/milt.12247
Authors
- Publisher:
- Wiley
- Journal:
- Milton Quarterly More from this journal
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 42-46
- Publication date:
- 2018-09-25
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-07-03
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1094-348X
- ISSN:
-
0026-4326
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:943639
- UUID:
-
uuid:45f84076-f76d-4877-973a-5e8c3dce947c
- Local pid:
-
pubs:943639
- Source identifiers:
-
943639
- Deposit date:
-
2018-11-30
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- John Wiley and Sons Ltd
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Rights statement:
- © 2018 John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Wiley at: https://doi.org/10.1111/milt.12247
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record