Thesis icon

Thesis

Pathways to inclusion and exclusion: An analysis of Medellín’s participatory budgeting process (2004-2017)

Alternative title:
Pathways to inclusion and exclusion: An analysis of Medellín’s participatory budgeting process (2004-2017)
Abstract:

Political exclusion from public decision-making processes is one of the main causes of conflicts worldwide. The scholarship on the political inclusion of marginalised populations in a broad range of contexts and fields is growing rapidly. A specific subject that is receiving increased attention is participatory budgeting, a process that allows citizens to decide how to spend part of the local government budget. Still, the studies that examine the influence of offline and online participatory budgeting on political inclusion in peacebuilding contexts remain scarce. This thesis aims at contributing to the literature by analysing the influence of participatory budgeting on political inclusion in Medellín, Colombia’s second-biggest city.

A case study approach was used to explore the participatory budgeting process in Medellín, from its launch as a city-wide policy in 2004 until its last regulatory change in 2017. Instead of testing pre-specified hypotheses, the thesis uses grounded theory to identify the factors and pathways that contribute to explain the influence of Medellín’s offline and online participatory budgeting on political inclusion in the view of its participants. The qualitative data collected and analysed suggests that participatory budgeting could boost political inclusion, while sometimes, even simultaneously, also reducing it. Using a grounded theory approach, this thesis develops a framework that explains how power dynamics and the deployment of the public budget through the participatory budget might foster or hinder political inclusion, depending on the design and implementation of the participatory budgeting process. The thesis also advances the literature by providing a thick description of political inclusion in Medellín’s participatory budgeting process, that characterises who are the actors that participate in the process and the distinctive dynamics of their interactions, along with how this participation may influence political inclusion.

Actions


Access Document


Files:

Authors


More by this author
Division:
SSD
Department:
Law
Sub department:
Socio-Legal Studies Centre
Role:
Author

Contributors

Role:
Supervisor
ORCID:
0000-0001-8164-2715
Role:
Examiner
Role:
Examiner


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100020163
Funding agency for:
Dajer, D
Grant:
2017-2018
Programme:
Systems Change Accelerator research grants
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007637
Funding agency for:
McNulty, S
Grant:
728
Programme:
Overseas PhD programme
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Dajer, D
Grant:
2016
Programme:
Build Peace Fellows Program


DOI:
Type of award:
DPhil
Level of award:
Doctoral
Awarding institution:
University of Oxford

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP