Journal article
From atheists to empiricists: reinterpreting the stoics in the German enlightenment
- Abstract:
- From the 1670s Stoic philosophy had been closely associated with atheism and the philosophy of Baruch Spinoza. However, in 1771 the historian Christoph Meiners published a short essay on the concept of apatheia that revived interest in Stoic philosophy within the German lands. Over the following years, he and his colleague Dieterich Tiedemann developed a novel interpretation claiming that Stoicism closely prefigured the philosophy of John Locke and represented a source of valuable philosophical ideas. Immanuel Kant, his allies, and later Idealists such as Hegel adopted this empiricist interpretation, despite their otherwise deep philosophical disagreements with Meiners and Tiedemann. Tracing eighteenth-century German debates around Stoicism reveals how it came to be considered a form of empiricism. As well as contributing to recent scholarship on the reception of Stoicism, the article suggests a major point of intersection between currents of the Enlightenment usually only treated separately.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 432.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/s1479244321000573
Authors
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Journal:
- Modern Intellectual History More from this journal
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 62 - 87
- Publication date:
- 2021-11-02
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1479-2451
- ISSN:
-
1479-2443
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1209901
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1209901
- Deposit date:
-
2021-11-15
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Morgan Golf-French.
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244321000573
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record