Journal article
Dunbar’s Number goes to Church: the Social Brain Hypothesis as a third strand in the study of church growth
- Abstract:
- The study of church growth has historically been divided into two strands of research: the Church Growth Movement and the Social Science approach. This article argues that Dunbar’s Social Brain Hypothesis represents a legitimate and fruitful third strand in the study of church growth, sharing features of both previous strands but identical with neither. We argue that five predictions derived from the Social Brain Hypothesis are accurately borne out in the empirical and practical church growth literature: that larger congregations lead to lower active engagement from members; that single-leader congregations are limited to around 150 members; that congregations of 150 are further stratified into smaller functioning groups; that congregations expanding beyond 150 members undergo internal tensions and are forced to reorganise; and that congregations larger than 150 will require structural sub-divisions to retain active member involvement. While these assertions are reflected in the church growth literature and articulate the common sense assumptions of church growth experts, the Social Brain Hypothesis offers a coherent theoretical framework which unifies these observations and thereby represents a distinctive contribution to church growth studies.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 295.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1177/0084672420906215
Authors
- Publisher:
- SAGE Publications
- Journal:
- Archive for the Psychology of Religion More from this journal
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 63-76
- Publication date:
- 2020-03-18
- Acceptance date:
- 2020-01-31
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1573-6121
- ISSN:
-
0084-6724
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1103302
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1103302
- Deposit date:
-
2020-05-07
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Bretherton and Dunbar
- Copyright date:
- 2020
- Rights statement:
- © The Author(s) 2020
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from SAGE Publications at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0084672420906215
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record