Journal article icon

Journal article

Refining the Multivariable Predictive‐Prognostic PREDICTR ‐ OPC Model for Survival in Surgical Escalation for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract:
Objectives: The PREDICTR‐OPC model is the only prognostic classifier for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) also predictive of surgical outcomes. Of the four biomarkers included, survivin contributes minimally and presents practical limitations. This study aimed to refine and simplify the model by removing survivin, then re‐assess its prognostic predictive performance compared to the original. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed a multi‐center training cohort (n = 600) and an external validation cohort (n = 385) of OPSCC patients. Tumor biopsies were stained for p16, high‐risk human papillomavirus (HR‐HPV) DNA, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and survivin and independently scored by at least three certified pathologists. Cox proportional hazards models assessed overall survival (OS), comparing three‐biomarker (p16, HR‐HPV, TILs) and four‐biomarker models. Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS were estimated in the validation cohort, adjusting for covariates. Discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluated performance and clinical utility. Results: Among 985 patients (median age: 57 years), median OS = 8.8 years (95% CI: 6.9–10.5). The three‐biomarker model yielded HR = 4.10 (95% CI: 2.41–6.98, p < 0.001) for high‐ vs. low‐risk groups in the validation cohort, comparable to the four‐biomarker model (HR = 4.24, p < 0.001). Surgery was associated with improved OS in high‐risk (HR = 0.45, p = 0.001) but not low‐risk (HR = 0.83, p = 0.72) patients, consistent with the original model. The models performed similarly across all metrics (e.g., Concordance Index: 0.71 vs. 0.72; Brier Score: 0.22 for both) as was model fit (Likelihood Ratio Test: p = 0.066). DCA revealed comparable clinical benefit. Conclusion: Removing survivin preserves PREDICTR‐OPC's predictive performance, offering a more cost‐effective, easier‐to‐implement tool for OPSCC treatment recommendations. Level of Evidence: 3
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1002/lary.70611

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0007-7102-9651


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/054225q67
Grant:
C19677/A12617


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
The Laryngoscope More from this journal
Article number:
lary.70611
Publication date:
2026-05-12
Acceptance date:
2026-04-30
DOI:
EISSN:
1531-4995
ISSN:
0023852X, 0023-852X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
4036213
Deposit date:
2026-05-12
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP