Journal article
Liability and Fault in Reasonableness and Risk
- Alternative title:
- Liability and Fault
- Abstract:
- This comment examines Reasonableness and Risk's pluralist account of strict liability, based on sovereignty rights and fairness. It begins by explaining the book's cogent arguments for some strict liability, and elaborates on how they might further be strengthened. More critically, it suggests that it is unclear why the book rejects more wide-ranging wrongs-based strict liability, and that its fairness justification needs further refinement.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 180.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1007/s10982-025-09537-4
Authors
- Publisher:
- Springer
- Journal:
- Law and Philosophy More from this journal
- Volume:
- 45
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 139-155
- Publication date:
- 2025-10-15
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-04-08
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1573-0522
- ISSN:
-
0167-5249
- Language:
-
English
- UUID:
-
uuid_446379d2-6368-4c9c-b2f3-661d79edd14b
- Source identifiers:
-
3703455
- Deposit date:
-
2026-01-28
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record