Journal article
Gamma Discounting and Expected Net Future Value.
- Abstract:
-
Recent research suggests that the long term future should be discounted with a declining discount rate. One such line of research, exemplified by Weitzman [Gamma discounting, Amer. Econ. Rev. 91 (2001) 261-271], shows that the certainty equivalent discount rate is declining when future capital productivity is uncertain. However, in a recent paper Gollier [Maximising the expected net future value as an alternative strategy to gamma discounting, Finan. Res. Lett. 1 (2004) 85-89] puts forward a puzzle that casts doubt on the validity of this conclusion. He asserts that using expected net future value, rather than conventional expected net present value, implies that the certainty equivalent discount rate increases over time. This paper resolves the apparent puzzle by encompassing the models of Gollier [Maximising the expected net future value as an alternative strategy to gamma discounting, Finan. Res. Lett. 1 (2004) 85-89] and Weitzman [Gamma discounting, Amer. Econ. Rev. 91 (2001) 261-271]. In fact, Gollier proves that as the evaluation date moves further into the future, the discount rate at a given point in time will increase. However, given a particular evaluation date, the schedule of discount rates is declining.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, pdf, 254.7KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.03.005
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management More from this journal
- Volume:
- 53
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 99 - 109
- Publication date:
- 2007-01-01
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0095-0696
- Language:
-
English
- UUID:
-
uuid:44568bea-5fc2-4b88-9d60-f146d5b9cb8f
- Local pid:
-
oai:economics.ouls.ox.ac.uk:12723
- Deposit date:
-
2011-08-15
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2007
- Notes:
- © 2006 Published by Elsevier Inc. NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53, (January 2007) DOI#10.1016/j.jeem.2006.03.005
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record