A direct comparison of methods for assessing the threat from emerging infectious diseases in seasonally varying environments

Kaye, AR; Hart, WS; Bromiley, J; Iwami, S; Thompson, RN

Journal article

A direct comparison of methods for assessing the threat from emerging infectious diseases in seasonally varying environments

Abstract:: Seasonal variations in environmental conditions lead to changing infectious disease epidemic risks at different times of year. The probability that early cases initiate a major epidemic depends on the season in which the pathogen enters the population. The instantaneous epidemic risk (IER) can be tracked. This quantity is straightforward to calculate, and corresponds to the probability of a major epidemic starting from a single case introduced at time t = t₀ , assuming that environmental conditions remain identical from that time onwards (i.e. for all t ≥ t₀ ). However, the threat when a pathogen enters the population in fact depends on changes in environmental conditions occurring within the timescale of the initial phase of the outbreak. For that reason, we compare the IER with a different metric: the case epidemic risk (CER). The CER corresponds to the probability of a major epidemic starting from a single case entering the population at time t = t₀ , accounting for changes in environmental conditions after that time. We show how the IER and CER can be calculated using different epidemiological models (the stochastic Susceptible-Infectious-Removed model and a stochastic host-vector model that is parameterised using temperature data for Miami) in which transmission parameter values vary temporally. While the IER is always easy to calculate numerically, the adaptable method we provide for calculating the CER for the host-vector model can also be applied easily and solved using widely available software tools. In line with previous research, we demonstrate that, if a pathogen is likely to either invade the population or fade out on a fast timescale compared to changes in environmental conditions, the IER closely matches the CER. However, if this is not the case, the IER and the CER can be significantly different, and so the CER should be used. This demonstrates the need to consider future changes in environmental conditions carefully when assessing the risk posed by emerging pathogens.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Kaye, A. R., Hart, W. S., Bromiley, J., Iwami, S., & Thompson, R. N. (2022). A direct comparison of methods for assessing the threat from emerging infectious diseases in seasonally varying environments. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 548.

MLA Style

Kaye, A. R., et al. “A Direct Comparison of Methods for Assessing the Threat from Emerging Infectious Diseases in Seasonally Varying Environments.” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 548, Elsevier, 2022.

Chicago Style

Kaye, AR, WS Hart, J Bromiley, S Iwami, and RN Thompson. 2022. “A Direct Comparison of Methods for Assessing the Threat from Emerging Infectious Diseases in Seasonally Varying Environments.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 548.
Share
Print