Journal article icon

Journal article

The relationship between perineal trauma and postpartum psychological outcomes: a secondary analysis of a population-based survey

Abstract:
IntroductionChildbirth-related perineal trauma affects the vast majority of women who give birth vaginally and subsequent complications such as wound infection occur frequently. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not currently recommended following first or second degree tears, or episiotomies. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics for preventing complications from perineal trauma across all types of childbirth-related perineal trauma.Materials and methodsDatabases were searched from inception to February 2024. Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised interventional studies and observational studies were eligible for inclusion where women experienced childbirth-related perineal trauma and received antibiotic prophylaxis or placebo, including any type of tear or episiotomy. The primary outcome was perineal wound infection. Results were combined into meta-analysis using a random effects model.Results14 studies were eligible for inclusion (eight randomised controlled trials, six observational) involving 8,878 women. Ten studies were deemed to have a high overall risk of bias. Overall the GRADE certainty of findings were low. Twelve studies were included in the analysis for perineal wound infection, involving 8,438 women. There was a reduced rate of perineal wound infection when prophylactic antibiotics were received (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.67). The subgroup analysis by type of tear demonstrated association with reduced risk of infection when prophylactic antibiotics were received, in the non-obstetric anal sphincter injuries combined subgroup (relative risk 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.41–0.63) and the episiotomy only subgroup (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.91).ConclusionsProphylactic antibiotics are associated with a reduced risk of perineal wound infection. Despite these findings, there are not sufficient high-quality randomised controlled trials to adequately inform guideline change amongst women with first/second degree tears or episiotomies. We recommend that an adequately powered, robust, randomised controlled trial is needed amongst women with first/second degree tears or episiotomies after spontaneous birth
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
NPEU
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8155-4117
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
NPEU
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-4186-4169
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5712-9989
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
NPEU
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-8058-6181
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Nuffield Department of Population Health
Sub department:
NPEU
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2404-5644


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100000272
Grant:
PR-PRU-1217-21202


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth More from this journal
Volume:
23
Issue:
1
Pages:
639-639
Article number:
639
Publication date:
2023-09-06
DOI:
EISSN:
1471-2393
ISSN:
1471-2393


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1528652
Local pid:
pubs:1528652
Source identifiers:
W4386482529
Deposit date:
2026-05-17
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP