Journal article icon

Journal article

Experiences and perceptions of trial participants and healthcare professionals in the UK Frozen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST): a nested qualitative study

Abstract:
Background Frozen shoulder is a condition associated with severe shoulder pain and loss of function impacting on a persons' physical and mental health. Hydrodistension treatment that has been widely adopted within the UK National Health Service for the condition. However, evidence of clinical effectiveness and understanding of the patient experiences of this treatment are lacking. This study explored the experiences of people with a frozen shoulder who received hydrodistension treatment. Methods A qualitative design with repeat semi-structured interviews was used to explore participants' experiences of hydrodistension treatment. Participants were interviewed 2-4 weeks and again at 8-10 weeks after treatment. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Findings were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis framework. The study is reported in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative (COREQ) research. Results 15 participants were interviewed online or over the phone. Three themes were identified: 'Preparing for and having a hydrodistension', 'Physiotherapy after hydrodistension', and 'Outcome of hydrodistension '. Participants believed hydrodistension would benefit them, was well tolerated by many, and the effects were apparent to most within the first week. Physiotherapy still seemed to be valued to support recovery beyond this timepoint, despite these early effects. Some participant's experienced harms including severe procedural pain and blood sugar dysregulation. Conclusion This is the first study to investigate the experiences of people who undergo hydrodistension for frozen shoulder. Hydrodistension appears an acceptable treatment to participants with a frozen shoulder, acceptability is enhanced through adequate shared decision making. Further high-quality research is required to understand the comparative effectiveness of hydrodistension as a treatment for frozen shoulder, including adverse events, and the benefit of treatment by a physiotherapist after hydrodistension
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040829
Publication website:
https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/635240/8/journal.pone.0304236.pdf

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-3540-8052
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-8144-6519
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9749-7014
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-6301-7684
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-9260-8643


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
BMJ Open More from this journal
Volume:
11
Issue:
6
Pages:
e040829-e040829
Publication date:
2021-06-11
Acceptance date:
2021-04-12
DOI:
EISSN:
2044-6055
ISSN:
2044-6055


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1181604
Local pid:
pubs:1181604
Source identifiers:
W3171313871
Deposit date:
2026-03-24
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP