Journal article icon

Journal article

Harm minimisation for self-harm: a cross-sectional survey of British clinicians’ perspectives and practices

Abstract:
ObjectiveHarm minimisation for self-harm is an alternative to preventive strategies and focuses on maximising safety when self-harming. We explored the views of clinicians on harm minimisation for self-harm to describe reported use and acceptability in clinical practice.DesignA cross-sectional study using an online survey consisting of fixed-choice and open-ended questions.SettingPrimary and secondary care practices in England, Scotland and Wales.ParticipantsSnowball sampling of UK-based clinicians (n=90; 67% female) working with people who self-harm and who have or have not previously recommended harm minimisation methods to patients.ResultsOf the 90 clinicians sampled, 76 (84%) reported having recommended harm minimisation techniques to people in their care who self-harm. Commonly recommended techniques were snapping rubber bands on one’s wrist and squeezing ice. Other techniques, such as teaching use of clean instruments when self-harming, were less likely to be recommended. Perceived client benefits included harm reduction and promotion of the therapeutic relationship. Perceived potential limitations of a harm minimisation approach for self-harm were (a) potential worsening of self-harm outcomes; (b) ethical reservations; (c) doubts about its effectiveness and appropriateness; and (d) lack of training and clear policies within the workplace.ConclusionsIn our sample of UK-based clinicians in various settings, harm minimisation for self-harm was broadly recommended for clients who self-harm due to perceived client benefits. However, future policies on harm minimisation must address clinicians’ perceived needs for training, well-defined guidelines, and clear evidence of effectiveness and safety to mitigate some clinician concerns about the potential for further harm.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056199

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5332-5314
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9742-1359
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5437-5962
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4022-8133


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
BMJ Open More from this journal
Volume:
12
Issue:
6
Pages:
e056199-e056199
Publication date:
2022-06-03
DOI:
EISSN:
2044-6055
ISSN:
2044-6055


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2380917
Local pid:
pubs:2380917
Source identifiers:
W4281877149
Deposit date:
2026-02-24
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP