Journal article
Harm minimisation for self-harm: a cross-sectional survey of British clinicians’ perspectives and practices
- Abstract:
- ObjectiveHarm minimisation for self-harm is an alternative to preventive strategies and focuses on maximising safety when self-harming. We explored the views of clinicians on harm minimisation for self-harm to describe reported use and acceptability in clinical practice.DesignA cross-sectional study using an online survey consisting of fixed-choice and open-ended questions.SettingPrimary and secondary care practices in England, Scotland and Wales.ParticipantsSnowball sampling of UK-based clinicians (n=90; 67% female) working with people who self-harm and who have or have not previously recommended harm minimisation methods to patients.ResultsOf the 90 clinicians sampled, 76 (84%) reported having recommended harm minimisation techniques to people in their care who self-harm. Commonly recommended techniques were snapping rubber bands on one’s wrist and squeezing ice. Other techniques, such as teaching use of clean instruments when self-harming, were less likely to be recommended. Perceived client benefits included harm reduction and promotion of the therapeutic relationship. Perceived potential limitations of a harm minimisation approach for self-harm were (a) potential worsening of self-harm outcomes; (b) ethical reservations; (c) doubts about its effectiveness and appropriateness; and (d) lack of training and clear policies within the workplace.ConclusionsIn our sample of UK-based clinicians in various settings, harm minimisation for self-harm was broadly recommended for clients who self-harm due to perceived client benefits. However, future policies on harm minimisation must address clinicians’ perceived needs for training, well-defined guidelines, and clear evidence of effectiveness and safety to mitigate some clinician concerns about the potential for further harm.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 719.3KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056199
Authors
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Journal:
- BMJ Open More from this journal
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 6
- Pages:
- e056199-e056199
- Publication date:
- 2022-06-03
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2044-6055
- ISSN:
-
2044-6055
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2380917
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2380917
- Source identifiers:
-
W4281877149
- Deposit date:
-
2026-02-24
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2022
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record