Journal article icon

Journal article

Failure to account for psychiatric symptoms: Implications for the replicability and generalizability of psychological science?

Abstract:
Background: One of the challenges of psychological research is obtaining a sample representative of the general population. One largely overlooked participant characteristic is sub-clinical levels of psychiatric symptoms. Methods: A series of studies were conducted to assess (i) whether typical psychology study participants had more psychiatric symptoms than the general population, (ii) whether there are sub-groups defined by psychiatric symptoms within the no-diagnosis, no-medication participant pool, and (iii) whether sub-clinical levels of psychiatric symptoms have an effect on standard behavioral tasks. Five UK national datasets (N > 10,000) were compared to data from psychology study participants (Study 1: n = 872; Study 2: n = 43,094; Study 3: n = 267). Results: Psychology study participants showed significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression and lower well-being, according to four commonly used mental health measures (GHQ-12, PHQ-8, WEMWBS, and WHO-5). Five sub-groups within the psychology study participant group were identified based on symptom levels, ranging from none to significant psychiatric symptoms. These groupings predicted performance on tests of executive function, including the Stroop task and the n-back task, as well as measures of intelligence. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that standard psychology participant pools are unrepresentative and suggests that a failure to account for psychiatric symptoms when recruiting for any psychological study is likely to negatively impact the reproducibility and generalizability of psychological science.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1017/s0033291725102237

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Sub department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3314-2550
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Sub department:
Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0003-4292-5570


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/03n0ht308


Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Journal:
Psychological Medicine More from this journal
Volume:
55
Pages:
e367-e367
Article number:
e367
Publication date:
2025-12-01
Acceptance date:
2025-10-07
DOI:
EISSN:
1469-8978
ISSN:
0033-2917


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2299540
UUID:
uuid_41ce7191-21b0-49f3-9fb9-b6963c29224e
Local pid:
pubs:2299540
Source identifiers:
3537280
Deposit date:
2025-12-05
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP