Journal article
Unconstitutional prorogation of Parliament
- Abstract:
- Argues, contrary to the constitutional convention, that the monarch is empowered in certain situations to reject ministerial advice to prorogue Parliament. Reviews evidence for the convention on prorogation, including statutory powers and ministerial advice, and considers the constitutional implications. Examines criticisms of R. (on the application of Miller) v Prime Minister (SC), and potential remedies open to the monarch for executive abuses.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 203.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publication website:
- https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IBC7F14D0A78711EAA9FCDB8212BE48B7/View/FullText.html
Authors
- Publisher:
- Sweet and Maxwell
- Journal:
- Public Law More from this journal
- Volume:
- 2020
- Issue:
- July
- Pages:
- 529-547
- Publication date:
- 2020-06-17
- Acceptance date:
- 2020-04-01
- ISSN:
-
0033-3565
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1136214
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1136214
- Deposit date:
-
2020-10-06
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Sweet and Maxwell
- Copyright date:
- 2020
- Rights statement:
- © Sweet and Maxwell 2020.
- Notes:
- This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Public Law following peer review. The definitive published version of Unconstitutional prorogation of Parliament is available online on Westlaw UK.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record