Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Electrical Stimulation of Denervated Muscle: A Narrative Review

Abstract:
Background: Electrical stimulation is commonly employed for activation of paralyzed muscles in patients with neurological diseases and injuries. However, there are differences in the treatment approaches that are possible for upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron injuries. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes findings from preclinical studies and clinical reports published over the past decades. Key topics include stimulation parameters, muscle physiology under denervation, and outcomes of invasive and noninvasive interventions. The selection of sources was based on their relevance to denervated muscle stimulation in both experimental and therapeutic contexts. Results: This review critically examined the physiological and therapeutic differences between indirect and direct stimulation of muscles in upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron injury situations. It then focused on the much less well‐established field of stimulation of denervated muscle, where there remains a pressing need for new clinical approaches. We explained the rationale for stimulating denervated muscles and the practical difficulties encountered in doing so, describing the use of both invasive and noninvasive devices in animal experiments and clinical trials. We then discussed related research using artificial reinnervation for denervated muscle stimulation and suggested directions for future exploration in this dynamic field. Conclusion: Stimulation of denervated muscle remains a promising but underdeveloped area. Electrical stimulation of denervated muscle can preserve muscle mass and potentially restore function. However, its clinical adoption has been limited by the exceptionally high stimulation thresholds required, which are approximately one thousand times higher than those for indirect muscle stimulation via intact lower motor neurons. These demands lead to significant challenges including discomfort, limited specificity due to the need for large electrodes, and the risk of tissue damage. Artificial reinnervation may offer a promising solution by enabling the use of conventional low‐energy stimulation techniques. Additionally, the application of stimulation in free muscle transfers may further expand therapeutic options in this area.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1111/aor.70076

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7626-9610
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Artificial Organs More from this journal
Publication date:
2025-12-26
Acceptance date:
2025-12-08
DOI:
EISSN:
1525-1594
ISSN:
0160564X, 0160-564X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2355180
UUID:
uuid_3f0373f7-0f07-4cfc-9b36-5d0382fcc3b1
Local pid:
pubs:2355180
Source identifiers:
3604537
Deposit date:
2025-12-26
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP