Journal article icon

Journal article

Polyethylene bearing wear is comparable for cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements: ten-year results of a randomized controlled trial

Abstract:
Purpose

There is concern that using cementless components may increase polyethylene wear of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (OUKR). Therefore, this study aimed to measure bearing wear at 10 years in patients from a randomized trial comparing Phase 3 cemented and cementless OUKRs and to investigate factors that may affect wear. It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in wear rate between cemented and cementless OUKRs.

Methods

Bearing thickness was determined using radiostereometric analysis at postoperative, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, 5-year and 10-year timepoints. As creep occurs early, wear rate was calculated using linear regression between 6 months and 10 years for 39 knees (20 cemented, 19 cementless). Associations between wear and implant, surgical and patient factors were analysed.

Results

The linear wear rate of the Phase 3 OUKR was 0.06 mm/year with no significant difference (p = 0.18) between cemented (0.054 mm/year) and cementless (0.063 mm/year) implants. Age, Oxford Knee Score, component size and bearing thickness had no correlation with wear. A body mass index ≥ 30 was associated with a significantly lower wear rate (p = 0.007) as was having ≥80% femoral component contact area on the bearing (p = 0.003). Bearings positioned ≥1.5 mm from the tibial wall had a significantly higher wear rate (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

At 10 years, the Phase 3 OUKR linear wear rate is low and not associated with the fixation method. To minimize the risk of wear-related bearing fracture in the very long-term surgeons should consider using 4 mm bearings in very young active patients and ensure that components are appropriately positioned, which is facilitated by the current instrumentation.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1002/ksa.12042

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2641-428X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3845-617X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/00mke2t69
Grant:
ORTHO.CR.GK10.12


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy More from this journal
Volume:
32
Issue:
2
Pages:
405-417
Place of publication:
Germany
Publication date:
2024-01-31
Acceptance date:
2023-12-11
DOI:
EISSN:
1433-7347
ISSN:
0942-2056
Pmid:
38298004


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1611887
Local pid:
pubs:1611887
Source identifiers:
W4391444017
Deposit date:
2025-03-19
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP