Journal article icon

Journal article

Implementing video group consultations in general practice during COVID-19: a qualitative study

Abstract:

Background: Group consultations have been gaining ground as a novel approach to service delivery. When in-person care was restricted owing to COVID-19, general practice staff began delivering group consultations remotely over video.


Aim: To examine how multiple interacting influences underpinned implementation and delivery of video group consultations (VGCs).


Design and setting: Qualitative study in general practice in England.


Method: a) 32 semi-structured interviews with patients, clinical, and non-clinical staff (from eight GP surgeries in total), NHS policymakers and programme managers, and other stakeholders; b) observation in relevant training and operational meetings; and c) three co-design workshops (21 participants). Thematic analysis was informed by the Planning and Evaluating Remote Consulting Services (PERCS) framework.


Results: In the first year of the pandemic, VGCs focused on supporting those with long-term conditions or other shared health and social needs. Most patients welcomed clinical and peer input, and the opportunity to access their practice remotely during lockdown. However, not everyone agreed to engage in group-based care or was able to access IT equipment. At practice level, significant work was needed to deliver VGCs, such as setting up the digital infrastructure, gaining team buy-in, developing new patient-facing online facilitation roles, managing background operational processes, protecting online confidentiality, and ensuring professional indemnity cover. Training provided nationally was seen as instrumental in capacity building for VGC implementation.


Conclusion: Small scale VGC implementation addressed unmet need during the pandemic. However, embedding VGCs in routine care requires rethinking of operational, infrastructural, and clinical processes. Additional research on costs and benefits at service and patient level is needed.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgp.2021.0673

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1189-7100
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7014-4793
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Oxford college:
Green Templeton College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2369-8088


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/001aqnf71
Grant:
ES/V010069/1
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0187kwz08
Grant:
NIHR133895
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/03n0ht308
Grant:
ES/V010069/1


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
Volume:
72
Issue:
720
Pages:
e483-e491
Place of publication:
England
Publication date:
2022-06-30
Acceptance date:
2022-03-10
DOI:
EISSN:
1478-5242
ISSN:
0960-1643
Pmid:
35636969


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1262625
Local pid:
pubs:1262625
Deposit date:
2024-11-11

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP