Journal article icon

Journal article

How well can we represent the spectrum of convective clouds in a climate model? Comparisons between internal parameterization variables and radar observations

Abstract:
Current climate models cannot resolve individual convective clouds and hence parameterizations are needed. The primary goal of convective parameterization is to represent the bulk impact of convection on the gridbox-scale variables. Spectral convective parameterizations also aim to represent the key features of the subgrid-scale convective cloud field such as cloud top height distribution and in-cloud vertical velocities, in addition to precipitation rates. Ground-based radar retrievals of these quantities have been made available at Darwin, Australia, permitting direct comparisons of internal parameterization variables and providing new observational references for further model development.

A spectral convective parameterization (the convective cloud field model, CCFM) is discussed, and its internal equation of motion is improved. Results from the ECHAM-HAM model in single column mode using CCFM and the bulk mass-flux Tiedtke-Nordeng scheme are compared with the radar retrievals at Darwin. CCFM is found to outperform the Tiedtke-Nordeng scheme for cloud top height and precipitation rate distributions. Radar observations are further used to propose a modified CCFM configuration with aerodynamic drag and reduced entrainment parameter, further improving both the convective cloud top height distribution (important for large-scale impact of convection) and the in-cloud vertical velocities (important for aerosol activation).

This study provides new development in CCFM improving the representation of convective cloud spectrum characteristics observed in Darwin. This is a new step towards an improved representation of convection and ultimately of aerosol effects on convection. It also shows how long-term radar observations of convective cloud properties can help constrain parameters of convective parameterization schemes.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1175/JAS-D-17-0191.1

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Physics
Sub department:
Atmos Ocean & Planet Physics
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS Division
Department:
Physics; Atmos Ocean & Planet Physics
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS Division
Department:
Physics; Atmos Ocean & Planet Physics
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Grant:
FP7/2007–2013) FP7–280025 ACCLAIM
FP7/2007-2013) BACCHUS 603445
Horizon 2020) 724602 RECAP


Publisher:
American Meteorological Society
Journal:
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences More from this journal
Volume:
75
Issue:
5
Pages:
1509–1524
Publication date:
2018-02-15
Acceptance date:
2018-02-07
DOI:
EISSN:
1520-0469
ISSN:
0022-4928


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:825143
UUID:
uuid:3dbc32e5-d22a-4309-a131-37d56f5ba3b5
Local pid:
pubs:825143
Deposit date:
2018-02-19

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP