Journal article : Comment
Assessing the Risk of Domination and Depoliticized Aspiration with Personalized AI Advisors: A Response to Queloz’s Commentary
- Abstract:
- I am grateful to Matthieu Queloz for his thoughtful commentary. I take his critique to be that, while personalization and co-reasoning are in many ways appealing, they are insufficient safeguards against manipulation or interference by bad actors. I address his central claims, clarifying and expanding as needed.
- Publication status:
- Published
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 610.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1007/s13347-025-01012-1
Authors
- Publisher:
- Springer
- Journal:
- Philosophy & Technology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 1
- Article number:
- 3
- Publication date:
- 2025-12-18
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-11-28
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2210-5441
- ISSN:
-
2210-5433
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subtype:
-
Comment
- Pubs id:
-
2355673
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2355673
- Source identifiers:
-
3576150
- Deposit date:
-
2025-12-18
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record