Linking artificial intelligence job exposure to expectations: Understanding AI losers, winners, and their political preferences

Journal article

The rapid expansion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the workplace has significant political implications. How can we understand perceptions of both personal job risks and opportunities, given each may affect political attitudes differently? We use an original, representative survey from Great Britain to reveal; (i) the degree to which people expect personal AI-based occupational risks versus opportunities, (ii) how much this perceived exposure corresponds to variation in existing expert-derived occupational AI-exposure measures; (iii) the social groups who expect to be AI winners and AI losers; and (iv) how personal AI expectations are associated with demand for different political policies. We find that over 1-in-3 British workers anticipate being an AI winner (10%) or loser (24%) and, while expectations correlate with classifications of occupational exposure, factors like education, gender, age, and employment sector also matter. Politically, both self-anticipated AI winners and losers show similar support for redistribution, but they differ on investment in education and training as well as on immigration. Our findings emphasise the importance of considering subjective winners and losers of AI; these patterns cannot be explained by existing occupational classifications of AI exposure.

Authors: Green, J; Grant, Z; Evans, G; Inglese, G

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: SAGE Publications
• Journal: Research & Politics
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 2
• Article number: 20531680251337897
• Publication date: 2025-06-01
• DOI: 10.1177/20531680251337897
• EISSN: 2053-1680
• Language: English
• Keywords: public opinion; Artificial intelligence; welfare state; job prospects; technology; economic insecurity