Journal article icon

Journal article

Gut microbial signatures and immunotherapy outcomes in NSCLC and melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract:
Background: The composition of the gut microbiome has been linked to clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but its prognostic association with outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma remains incompletely defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise the evidence on the association between baseline gut microbial signatures and ICI outcomes in these malignancies. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus through April 2025 for studies correlating baseline gut microbiota with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), or immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with NSCLC or melanoma receiving ICIs. We pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) using random-effects models and assessed evidence quality with the GRADE framework. Results: We included 26 studies comprising 1,542 patients. High gut microbial alpha diversity was significantly associated with improved OS (pooled HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.41–0.66) and PFS (pooled HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47–0.71). The presence of *Akkermansia* was associated with a higher ORR (pooled OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.38–3.35). Conversely, recent antibiotic use was associated with worse OS (pooled HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.34–2.21). In patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 therapy, a high abundance of *Bacteroidetes* was associated with a lower risk of severe colitis (pooled OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18–0.64). The overall certainty of evidence was rated as moderate for most outcomes. Conclusion: Baseline gut microbiome features, particularly high diversity and the presence of specific commensal taxa, are moderately associated with superior clinical outcomes to ICIs in NSCLC and melanoma. Our findings suggest that the gut microbiome could serve as a useful prognostic biomarker and may sooner or later be modulated to increase ICI efficacy.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s12885-026-15763-3

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
BMC Cancer More from this journal
Volume:
26
Issue:
1
Article number:
340
Publication date:
2026-02-21
Acceptance date:
2026-02-16
DOI:
EISSN:
1471-2407
ISSN:
1471-2407


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2383568
Local pid:
pubs:2383568
Source identifiers:
3846765
Deposit date:
2026-03-12
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP