Journal article
Diagnostic performance of single-lead electrocardiograms from the Apple Watch and CART ring for cardiac arrhythmias
- Abstract:
-
Background: Wearable devices are widely used for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection, yet most validation studies include only sinus rhythm or AF, likely overestimating diagnostic performance.
Objective: This multicenter study assessed the performance of automated AF detection and physician interpretation of single-lead electrocardiograms (SL-ECGs) from the Apple Watch and CART Ring.
Methodology: Participants underwent simultaneous 12-lead ECG and SL-ECGs from Apple Watch and CART Ring. Two cardiologists independently adjudicated all ECGs. Apple Watch and CART Ring classified recordings as “AF,” “Not AF,” or “Unclassified.” Diagnostic performance for automated AF detection was evaluated in “worst-case” (all SL-ECGs) and lenient (excluding unclassified SL-ECGs) scenarios. Physician interpretation of SL-ECGs was also compared to 12-lead ECG.
Results: Among 483 patients (median age, 66 years; 29% female), 196 (39%) had AF across 3 United Kingdom centers. A total of 2398 ECGs were analyzed. Interobserver variability was excellent (Cohen’s kappa: Apple Watch, 0.85; CART Ring, 0.84). In the “worst-case” analysis, CART Ring outperformed Apple Watch (sensitivity, 84.6% vs 69.1%; specificity, 89.9% vs 72.6%). Apple Watch had more unclassified SL-ECGs (20.1%) than CART Ring (1.9%). The lenient analysis showed an improvement in sensitivity (CART Ring, 84.8 %; Apple Watch, 86.4%) and specificity (CART Ring, 91.2%; Apple Watch, 91.7%). Physician interpretation improved diagnostic performance for AF and sinus rhythm but remained limited for other arrhythmias
Conclusion: Apple Watch missed approximately 1 in 3 episodes of AF and a high number of unclassified SL-ECG. CART Ring demonstrated superior performance. Physician interpretation significantly improved AF diagnosis but remained unreliable for other arrhythmias, emphasizing the need for cautious integration of wearable ECGs into clinical practice.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.1MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.019
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Heart Rhythm O2 More from this journal
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 6
- Pages:
- 808-817
- Publication date:
- 2025-03-26
- Acceptance date:
- 2025-03-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2666-5018
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2117482
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2117482
- Deposit date:
-
2025-04-15
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Heart Rhythm Society
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © 2025 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article published under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record