Journal article icon

Journal article

Prospective comparative study of quantitative X-ray (QXR) versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry to determine the performance of QXR as a predictor of bone health for adult patients in secondary care

Abstract:
Objectives To evaluate a method of quantitative X-ray (QXR) for obtaining bone health information from standard radiographs aimed at identifying early signs of osteoporosis to enable improved referral and treatment. This QXR measurement is performed by postexposure analysis of standard radiographs, meaning bone health data can be acquired opportunistically, alongside routine imaging.Design The relationship between QXR and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was demonstrated with a phantom study. A prospective clinical study was conducted to establish areal bone mineral density (aBMD) prediction model and a risk prediction model of a non-normal DEXA outcome. This was then extrapolated to a larger patient group with DEXA referral data.Setting Secondary care National Health Service Hospital.Participants 126 consenting adult patients from a DEXA clinic.Interventions All participants underwent a DEXA scan to determine BMD at the lumbar spine (L2–L4) and both hips. An additional Antero-Posterior pelvis X-ray on a Siemens Ysio, fixed digital radiograph system was performed for the study.Outcome Performance of QXR as a risk predictor for non-normal (osteoporotic) BMD.Results Interim clinical study data from 78 patients confirmed a receiver operator curve (area under the ROC curve) of 0.893 (95% CI 0.843 to 0.942) for a risk prediction model of non-normal DEXA outcome. Extrapolation of these results to a larger patient group of 11 029 patients indicated a positive predictive value of 0.98 (sensitivity of 0.8) for a population of patients referred to DEXA under current clinical referral criteria.Conclusions This study confirms that the novel QXR method provides accurate prediction of a DEXA outcome.Trial registration number ISRCTN98160454; Pre-results
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051021

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5452-8578
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5060-4214
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7976-2416


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100000780
Grant:
777835
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100011699
Grant:
Not Applicable


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
BMJ Open More from this journal
Volume:
11
Issue:
12
Pages:
e051021-e051021
Publication date:
2021-12-24
Acceptance date:
2021-11-30
DOI:
EISSN:
2044-6055
ISSN:
2044-6055


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1230520
Local pid:
pubs:1230520
Source identifiers:
W4200488448
Deposit date:
2026-04-08
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP