Journal article icon

Journal article

Using scores from the 4AT delirium detection tool as an indicator of possible dementia: a study of 75 221 older adult hospital admissions

Abstract:
Introduction: Overall dementia diagnosis rates are substantially below true rates. Hospital admissions of older people involve cognitive and functional assessments relevant to dementia diagnosis. These assessments could be harnessed to contribute to identifying patients for further assessment. Yet relationships of inpatient cognitive tests with known dementia are unclear. The 4AT (www.the4AT.com) assesses for delirium (Scores 4–12) and also cognitive impairment via embedded cognitive tests (Scores 1–3). We investigated relationships between 4AT scores and clinical dementia diagnoses. Methods: We included participants aged ≥65 years admitted as a medical emergency to three hospitals from 4 January 2016 to 4 January 2020, who had the 4AT performed on admission. Clinical dementia diagnosis was ascertained from linked primary care, hospital discharge and community prescribing data. Results: Of 75 221 admissions, 62 188 (82.7%; 33 625 unique patients; mean age 80.2 years; 55.8% female) had a 4AT on admission. Of these, 9948 (16.0%) had a recorded clinical dementia diagnosis at the time of admission, with a further 1197 (1.9%) receiving a new diagnosis at discharge. Of admissions with dementia, 9669/11 145 (86.8%) had a 4AT score ≥1 on admission, compared to 14 994/51 043 (29.4%) without dementia. 4AT ≥1 had a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.86–0.87) and a specificity of 0.71 (0.70–0.71) in relation to clinical dementia diagnosis. 4AT ≥4 showed sensitivity of 0.50 (0.50–0.51) and a specificity of 0.88 (0.88–0.88). Conclusions: 4AT scores were associated with clinically diagnosed dementia. These results suggest that routinely collected 4AT scores could be leveraged in conjunction with other clinical indicators to identify patients with possible undiagnosed dementia who could undergo further inpatient diagnostic assessment and/or post-discharge specialist follow-up.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1093/ageing/afaf144

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7023-7108
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Sub department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6428-4554


Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Journal:
Age and Ageing More from this journal
Volume:
54
Issue:
6
Article number:
afaf144
Publication date:
2025-06-16
Acceptance date:
2025-05-14
DOI:
EISSN:
1468-2834
ISSN:
0002-0729


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2130615
Local pid:
pubs:2130615
Source identifiers:
3027385
Deposit date:
2025-06-16
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP