Journal article icon

Journal article

A mixed-methods study to investigate feasibility and acceptability of an early warning score for preterm infants in neonatal units in Kenya: results of the NEWS-K study

Abstract:
Preterm birth (\u3c 37 weeks gestation) complications are the leading cause of neonatal mortality. Early-warning scores (EWS) are charts where vital signs (e.g., temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate) are recorded, triggering action. To evaluate whether a neonatal EWS improves clinical outcomes in low-middle income countries, a randomised trial is needed. Determining whether the use of a neonatal EWS is feasible and acceptable in newborn units, is a prerequisite to conducting a trial. We implemented a neonatal EWS in three newborn units in Kenya. Staff were asked to record infants’ vital signs on the EWS during the study, triggering additional interventions as per existing local guidelines. No other aspects of care were altered. Feasibility criteria were pre-specified. We also interviewed health professionals (n = 28) and parents/family members (n = 42) to hear their opinions of the EWS. Data were collected on 465 preterm and/or low birthweight (\u3c 2.5 kg) infants. In addition to qualitative study participants, 45 health professionals in participating hospitals also completed an online survey to share their views on the EWS. 94% of infants had the EWS completed at least once during their newborn unit admission. EWS completion was highest on the day of admission (93%). Completion rates were similar across shifts. 15% of vital signs triggered escalation to a more senior member of staff. Health professionals reported liking the EWS, though recognised the biggest barrier to implementation was poor staffing. Newborn unit infant to staff ratios varied between 10 and 53 staff per 1 infant, depending upon time of shift and staff type. A randomised trial of neonatal EWS in Kenya is possible and acceptable, though adaptations are required to the form before implementation
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s12887-024-04778-z

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6998-4533
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0851-3711
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8382-6040
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3324-6771
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2792-7861


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/100014013
Grant:
MR/T039027/1


Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
BMC Pediatrics More from this journal
Volume:
24
Issue:
1
Pages:
326-326
Article number:
326
Publication date:
2024-05-11
DOI:
EISSN:
1471-2431
ISSN:
1471-2431


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1997295
Local pid:
pubs:1997295
Source identifiers:
W4396830594
Deposit date:
2026-06-11
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP