Journal article
Conscientious refusal or conscientious provision: we can't have both
- Abstract:
- Some authors argue that it is permissible for clinicians to conscientiously provide abortion services because clinicians are already allowed to conscientiously refuse to provide certain services. Call this the symmetry thesis. We argue that on either of the two main understandings of the aim of the medical profession—what we will call “pathocentric” and “interest-centric” views—conscientious refusal and conscientious provision are mutually exclusive. On pathocentric views, refusing to provide a service that takes away from a patient's health is professionally justified because there are compelling reasons, based on professional standards, to refuse to provide that service (e.g., it does not heal, and it is contrary to the goals of medicine). However, providing that same service is not professionally justified when providing that service would be contrary to the goals of medicine. Likewise, the thesis turns out false on interest-centric views. Refusing to provide a service is not professionally justified when that service helps the patient fulfill her autonomous preferences because there are compelling reasons, based on professional standards, to provide that service (e.g., it helps her achieve her autonomous preferences, and it would be contrary to the goals of medicine to deny her that service). However, refusing to provide that same service is not professionally justified when refusing to provide that service would be contrary to the goals of medicine. As a result, on either of the two most plausible views on the goals of medicine, the symmetry thesis turns out false.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 662.8KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1111/bioe.13285
Authors
- Publisher:
- Wiley
- Journal:
- Bioethics More from this journal
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 5
- Pages:
- 445-451
- Publication date:
- 2024-03-22
- Acceptance date:
- 2024-02-21
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1467-8519
- ISSN:
-
0269-9702
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1634998
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1634998
- Deposit date:
-
2024-02-23
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Kulesa and Giubilini
- Copyright date:
- 2024
- Rights statement:
- © 2024 The Authors. Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record