Journal article : Comment
Balancing simplicity and complexity through corporate emissions benchmarking
- Abstract:
- Standardized quantitative emissions benchmarking is essential for corporate climate accountability, yet recent literature has critiqued this approach. We argue for structured pluralism with budget compliance — balancing methodological flexibility while preserving the disciplining power of carbon budgets.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Reviewed (other)
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 496.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1038/s41558-025-02467-y
Authors
+ Australian Research Council
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/05mmh0f86
- Grant:
- DE240100533
- Publisher:
- Springer Nature
- Journal:
- Nature Climate Change More from this journal
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 11
- Pages:
- 1127–1129
- Publication date:
- 2025-10-23
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1758-6798
- ISSN:
-
1758-678X
- Language:
-
English
- Subtype:
-
Comment
- Pubs id:
-
2300951
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2300951
- Deposit date:
-
2025-10-23
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Springer Nature Limited
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Rights statement:
- © 2025, Springer Nature Limited
- Notes:
- The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record