Journal article
Accumulative experiences: navigating healthcare for recurrent vulvovaginal thrush from patient and clinician perspectives
- Abstract:
-
Background: Existing research on recurrent vulvovaginal thrush primarily frames experiences through the lens of acute, episodic, and one-off cases. Studies are lacking which investigate the implications of embedding recurrent cases into acute frameworks. This paper explores how a condition that is usually seen as one-off transitions into something for patients and healthcare professionals to think about and act on as needing longer-term care.
Aim: To understand patient and clinician perspectives on seeking and providing care for recurrent vulvovaginal thrush, and how these insights might improve healthcare experiences.
Design and Setting: Qualitative study of patient experiences with recurrent vulvovaginal thrush, and healthcare professional perspectives about providing care.
Method: Interviews with 32 patients and 25 healthcare professionals working in primary care and sexual health services in England. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Patient and public involvement informed study development and interpretation of results.
Results: Patients and healthcare professionals agreed that acute, transient, and one-off cases of thrush could be self-managed effectively through pharmacy care. When thrush returned, persisted, or evolved, care needed to transition to a different approach, plan, and/or pathway was needed, however, integrating acute episodes could be complex. The themes highlight areas where the needs of people with recurrent vulvovaginal thrush diverged from acute cases, in terms of: (1) navigating disjointed health services, (2) recognising and responding to recurrence, (3) building ongoing healthcare relationships.
Conclusion: Recurrent vulvovaginal thrush can be managed effectively in primary care, but requires approaches attentive to transitions, collaboration, and recognition of accumulative experiences.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 418.9KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3399/BJGP.2025.0531
Authors
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
- Publication date:
- 2026-01-27
- Acceptance date:
- 2026-01-08
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1478-5242
- ISSN:
-
0960-1643
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2363365
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2363365
- Deposit date:
-
2026-01-22
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Ford et al
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Rights statement:
- © 2026 The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record