Preprint icon

Preprint

Cost-effectiveness of adoption strategies for point of care HIV viral load monitoring in South Africa

Abstract:
Background: Viral load (VL) testing is recommended for monitoring people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART). The National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) in South Africa conducted >5 million VL tests at 16 laboratories in 2018 but faced challenges with specimen integrity and results delivery. Point-of-care (POC) VL monitoring may improve results delivery and viral suppression. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of different adoption strategies for POC testing in South Africa.

Methods: We developed a cost-outcome model utilizing NHLS data, including facility-level annual VL volume, suppression rates (<1000 copies/ml), specimen rejection rates, turn-around time, and the cost/test. We assessed the health and economic impact of adopting two validated POC VL technologies (Cepheid GeneXpert and Abbott m-PIMATM) under 4 scenarios: 1) status-quo; 2) targeted POC testing at facilities with high levels of viral failure; 3) targeted POC testing at low-performing facilities; and 4) complete POC adoption. For each scenario, we determined the total cost, effectiveness (expected number of people with suppressed VL) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) based on expected improvement in suppression rates.

Finding: The existing centralized network of laboratory based VL testing costs USD126m annually and achieves a VL suppression rate of 85.2%. Targeted testing using the GeneXpert, was the most cost-effective approach, with 88.5% VL suppression and USD40 per additional person suppressed, compared to the centralized network. Should resources allow, complete POC VL adoption may be cost-effective (ICER: USD136/additional person suppressed), requiring an additional $49m annually and achieving VL 94.5% suppression. All other scenarios were dominated in the incremental analysis.

Interpretation: Assuming POC HIV viral load monitoring confers clinical benefits consistent with trial results, the most cost-effective strategy for POC adoption in South Africa is likely a targeted approach with POC VL technologies placed at facilities with high rates of viral failure.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Not peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Preprint server copy:
10.2139/ssrn.3659181

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Oxford college:
Green Templeton College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-6072-1430


Preprint server:
SSRN
Publication date:
2020-11-12
DOI:
EISSN:
1556-5068
Server owner:
Elsevier


Language:
English
Pubs id:
1261267
Local pid:
pubs:1261267
Source identifiers:
W3212857852
Deposit date:
2026-05-29
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP