Journal article icon

Journal article

Parent-led CBT delivered via online and telephone support alongside usual school practice versus usual school practice only for young children identified as at-risk for anxiety disorders through screening in schools: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract:

Background: Providing accessible CBT for young children identified as at-risk for anxiety disorders through screening in schools could reduce later problems. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of parent-led CBT delivered via online and telephone call support alongside usual school provision, compared to usual school provision only, for young children identified through screening as having at least one risk.

Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, parallel group, superiority cluster randomised controlled trial in 95 primary/infant schools in England. Parents of children (aged 4-7) in sampled classes completed screening, and children who screened positive for one or more risks (anxiety symptoms/inhibition/parent anxiety) were eligible for the trial. Schools (clusters) were randomised (1:1) to intervention or usual school practice, stratified by school-level deprivation. Schools in both arms continued with usual provision, and parents in intervention schools were offered parent-led CBT via online and telephone support. The primary outcome was the presence of an anxiety disorder diagnosis at 12-months, assessed via the ADIS-P administered by independent assessors. Secondary clinical outcomes included parent-reported child anxiety symptoms, related interference, externalising symptoms, additional risks and intervention targets at 12-weeks and 12-months. Primary analyses were conducted on the full intention-to-treat population. The trial was prospectively registered with ISRCTN 82398107.

Results: 2328 children were screened; 1172 were eligible; 865 enrolled. 48 schools (434 children) were assigned to intervention and 47 schools (431 children) to usual school practice. At 12-months the overall frequency of anxiety disorders was low, 6.8% (21/310) of children in the intervention arm compared to 11.5% (36/312) in the usual school practice arm; this difference was not statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio 0.67 [0.37 to 1.21], p=0.19). However, the intervention was superior to usual school practice across all secondary outcomes (standardised mean difference: 0.15 to 0.47 at 12-weeks; 0.19 to 0.41 at 12-months). No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Although the intervention did not significantly reduce anxiety disorders at 12-months, improvements across all other assessed outcomes indicate this approach brings wider immediate benefits and reduces known risks for future anxiety disorders. Future research needs to consider longer-term preventative effects.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1111/jcpp.70119

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9298-091X
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry More from this journal
Publication date:
2026-02-19
Acceptance date:
2025-12-17
DOI:
EISSN:
1469-7610
ISSN:
0021-9630


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2356366
Local pid:
pubs:2356366
Deposit date:
2026-01-05
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP