Journal article : Review
Interventions to Enable or Improve Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health and Preventive Medicine: A Scoping Review
- Abstract:
- IntroductionPublic health and preventive medicine is the branch of medicine that implements population-level health interventions. Public health and preventive medicine specialists practice at the intersection of medicine and public health. These 2 disciplines approach the application of evidence to decision making differently, and it is unclear how public health and preventive medicine specialists are trained to navigate between these approaches. To better understand the interventions available to support public health and preventive medicine physicians in making evidence-informed decisions in this space, the authors conducted a scoping review to summarize planned or implemented interventions that support or are intended to support evidence-informed decision making in public health and preventive medicine practice.MethodsIn March and April 2025, the authors searched multiple databases and prespecified websites to identify published and unpublished academic and gray literature reports published in English between 1992 and March 2025 that described interventions intended to enable or improve evidence-informed decision making in public health and preventive medicine practice. Data extracted included, where reported, publication date, authors, title, publication source, actual or intended participants, participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, funding sources, and intervention outcome.ResultsThe authors identified 246 records, 234 through database and website searches and 12 through citation searches, of which 9 were duplicates. Ultimately, the authors included 17 reports that described 7 unique interventions in this scoping review. The majority (11 of 17) of reports described interventions that took place in the U.S., and most (9 of 17) reports described an iteration of the Evidence-Based Public Health Course. All interventions reported success, most often in terms of positive participant reaction, self-reported participant learning, or participant behaviour change. One intervention, an organizational strategic plan that supported evidence-informed decision-making capacity, reported organizational- and population-level impacts.DiscussionThis scoping review did not identify any interventions specifically targeting evidence-informed decision making in public health and preventive medicine, but there was some indication that there are differences between the types of evidence that physicians value most and those by other public health professionals. The components of evidence-informed decision making in public health implemented or taught in the interventions identified in this scoping review differ from the components of evidence-based medicine taught in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education, which has implications for physicians working in public health.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 550.4KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100473
Authors
+ Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- 10.13039/501100000241
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- AJPM Focus More from this journal
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 100473
- Article number:
- 100473
- Publication date:
- 2025-12-11
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2773-0654
- ISSN:
-
2773-0654
- Pmid:
-
41940210
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Subtype:
-
Review
- Pubs id:
-
2354844
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2354844
- Source identifiers:
-
3946869
- Deposit date:
-
2026-04-21
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2025
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record