Journal article icon

Journal article

Epidemiology of placenta previa accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract:

Objective To estimate the prevalence and incidence of placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and to examine the different criteria being used for the diagnosis.

Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources PubMed, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov and MEDLINE were searched between August 1982 and September 2018.

Eligibility criteria Studies reporting on placenta previa complicated by PAS diagnosed in a defined obstetric population.

Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers performed the data extraction using a predefined protocol and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies, with difference agreed by consensus. The primary outcomes were overall prevalence of placenta previa, incidence of PAS according to the type of placenta previa and the reported clinical outcomes, including the number of peripartum hysterectomies and direct maternal mortality. The secondary outcomes included the criteria used for the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of placenta previa and the criteria used to diagnose and grade PAS at birth.

Results A total of 258 articles were reviewed and 13 retrospective and 7 prospective studies were included in the analysis, which reported on 587 women with placenta previa and PAS. The meta-analysis indicated a significant (p<0.001) heterogeneity between study estimates for the prevalence of placenta previa, the prevalence of placenta previa with PAS and the incidence of PAS in the placenta previa cohort. The median prevalence of placenta previa was 0.56% (IQR 0.39–1.24) whereas the median prevalence of placenta previa with PAS was 0.07% (IQR 0.05–0.16). The incidence of PAS in women with a placenta previa was 11.10% (IQR 7.65–17.35).

Conclusions The high heterogeneity in qualitative and diagnostic data between studies emphasises the need to implement standardised protocols for the diagnoses of both placenta previa and PAS, including the type of placenta previa and grade of villous invasiveness.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031193

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
Women’s & Reproductive Health
Sub department:
Women's & Reproductive Health
Department:
Oxford, MSD, Womens & Reproductive Health
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0648-7433


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing
Journal:
BMJ Open More from this journal
Volume:
9
Issue:
11
Article number:
e031193
Publication date:
2019-11-12
Acceptance date:
2019-10-16
DOI:
ISSN:
2044-6055


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:1063403
UUID:
uuid:3465c993-bded-4907-bfbe-6c522e21e791
Local pid:
pubs:1063403
Source identifiers:
1063403
Deposit date:
2019-10-17

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP