Conference item
Synthesising interprocedural bit-precise termination proofs
- Abstract:
- Proving program termination is key to guaranteeing absence of undesirable behaviour, such as hanging programs and even security vulnerabilities such as denial-of-service attacks. To make termination checks scale to large systems, interprocedural termination analysis seems essential, which is a largely unexplored area of research in termination analysis, where most effort has focussed on difficult single-procedure problems. We present a modular termination analysis for C programs using template-based interprocedural summarisation. Our analysis combines a context-sensitive, over-approximating forward analysis with the inference of under-approximating preconditions for termination. Bit-precise termination arguments are synthesised over lexicographic linear ranking function templates. Our experimental results show that our tool 2LS outperforms state-of-the-art alternatives, and demonstrate the clear advantage of interprocedural reasoning over monolithic analysis in terms of efficiency, while retaining comparable precision.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 392.1KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1109/ASE.2015.10
Authors
- Publisher:
- IEEE
- Host title:
- 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
- Journal:
- 30th IEEE/AC30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) More from this journal
- Pages:
- 53-64
- Publication date:
- 2016-01-04
- DOI:
- ISBN:
- 9781509000241
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:606648
- UUID:
-
uuid:33745f28-a242-499c-8a57-d106df7ad2f3
- Local pid:
-
pubs:606648
- Source identifiers:
-
606648
- Deposit date:
-
2017-01-28
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- IEEE
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- © 2015 IEEE. This is the Accepted Manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from IEEE at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2015.10
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record