The more you know: voter heuristics and the information search

Journal article

Informed voting is costly: research shows that voters use heuristics such as party identification and retrospection to make choices that approximate enlightened decision-making. Most of this work, however, focuses on high-information races and ignores elections in which these cues are often unavailable (e.g. primary, local). In these cases, citizens are on their own to search for quality information and evaluate it efficiently. To assess how voters navigate this situation, we field three survey experiments asking respondents what information they want before voting. We evaluate respondents on their ability to both acquire and utilize information in a way that improves their chances of voting for quality candidates, and how this varies by the sophistication of respondents and the offices sought by candidates. We find strong evidence that voters use “deal-breakers” to quickly eliminate undesirable candidates; however, the politically unsophisticated rely on unverifiable, vague, and irrelevant search considerations. Moreover, less sophisticated voters also rely on more personalistic considerations. The findings suggest that voters’ search strategies may be ineffective at identifying the best candidates for office, especially at the local level.

Authors: Bernhard, R; Freeder, S

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Springer US
• Journal: Political Behavior
• Publication date: 2018-11-18
• Acceptance date: 2018-10-19
• DOI: 10.1007/s11109-018-9512-2
• EISSN: 1573-6687
• ISSN: 0190-9320
• Keywords: information search; nonpartisan elections; primaries; heuristics; local elections