Journal article icon

Journal article

The accuracy and suitability of eating disorder screening tools for binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa in a primary care setting: a systematic review and narrative summary

Abstract:

Background

Despite available screening tools for eating disorders (EDs), the accuracy and suitability of these in identifying Binge eating disorder (BED) and Bulimia nervosa (BN) in a primary care setting are undetermined, despite BED/BN being the most common EDs.

Aim

To evaluate the accuracy and suitability of ED screening tools for BED/BN in a primary care setting.

Design & setting

A systematic review with narrative synthesis in a primary care setting.

Method

Six databases were searched, including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion. Studies were included that assessed the accuracy and/or suitability of screening tools for BED/BN in primary care. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative summary was created after integrating the data using a convergent segregated approach.

Results

Four studies met inclusion criteria. The included studies reported on BEDS-7, EDE-Q and SCOFF screening tools. No studies reported on the accuracy of screening tools for BED and suitability for BN. BEDS-7 and EDE-Q screening tools reported variations in their suitability in primary care. The main barrier to implementation in primary care was time constraints and a lack of trust in screening. SCOFF showed high sensitivity (97.88-100%) for BN but had lower specificity (89.6-94.4%), increasing false positives.

Conclusion

ED screening tools face feasibility and accuracy concerns for BED/BN in a primary care setting. Further research is needed to validate screening tools' accuracy and suitability in a primary care setting for BED and BN in the general population.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0149

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2121-5022
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-4108-8283
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-2025-5695
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9931-9198
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0859-9965


Publisher:
Royal College of General Practitioners
Journal:
British Journal of General Practice Open More from this journal
Pages:
BJGPO.2025.0149-BJGPO.2025.0149
Publication date:
2025-10-08
DOI:
EISSN:
2398-3795
ISSN:
2398-3795


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2394402
Local pid:
pubs:2394402
Source identifiers:
W4414958062
Deposit date:
2026-03-25
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP