Secondary transfer of emergency stroke patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy by air in rural England: economic evaluation and considerations

Coughlan, D; McMeekin, P; Flynn, D; Ford, GA; Lumley, H; Burgess, D; Balami, J; Mawson, A; Craig, D; Rice, S; White, P

Journal article

Secondary transfer of emergency stroke patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy by air in rural England: economic evaluation and considerations

Abstract:: Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a time-sensitive emergency procedure for patients who had ischaemic stroke leading to improved health outcomes. Health systems need to ensure that MT is delivered to as many patients as quickly as possible. Using decision modelling, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of secondary transfer by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) compared with ground emergency medical services (GEMS) of rural patients eligible for MT in England. Methods The model consisted of (1) a short-run decision tree with two branches, representing secondary transfer transportation strategies and (2) a long-run Markov model for a theoretical population of rural patients with a confirmed ischaemic stroke. Strategies were compared by lifetime costs: quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost per QALY gained and net monetary benefit. Sensitivity and scenario analyses explored uncertainty around parameter values. Results We used the base case of early-presenting (<6 hours to arterial puncture) patient aged 75 years who had stroke to compare HEMS and GEMS. This produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £28 027 when a 60 min reduction in travel time was assumed. Scenario analyses showed the importance of the reduction in travel time and futile transfers in lowering ICERs. For late presenting (>6 hours to arterial puncture), ground transportation is the dominant strategy. Conclusion Our model indicates that using HEMS to transfer patients who had stroke eligible for MT from remote hospitals in England may be cost-effective when: travel time is reduced by at least 60 min compared with GEMS, and a £30 000/QALY threshold is used for decision-making. However, several other logistic considerations may impact on the use of air transportation.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Coughlan, D., McMeekin, P., Flynn, D., Ford, G. A., Lumley, H., Burgess, D., Balami, J., Mawson, A., Craig, D., Rice, S., & White, P. (2020). Secondary transfer of emergency stroke patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy by air in rural England: economic evaluation and considerations. Emergency Medicine Journal, 38(1), 33–39.

MLA Style

Coughlan, D, et al. “Secondary Transfer of Emergency Stroke Patients Eligible for Mechanical Thrombectomy by Air in Rural England: Economic Evaluation and Considerations.” Emergency Medicine Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, 2020, pp. 33–39.

Chicago Style

Coughlan, D, P McMeekin, D Flynn, et al. 2020. “Secondary Transfer of Emergency Stroke Patients Eligible for Mechanical Thrombectomy by Air in Rural England: Economic Evaluation and Considerations.” Emergency Medicine Journal 38 (1): 33–39.
Print