Journal article : Review

Candea, Matei. Comparison in anthropology: the impossible method. xiv, 392 pp., figs, bibliogr. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 2018. £24.99 (paper)

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Reviewed (other)

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Share
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Gellner, D. N. (2022). Candea, Matei. Comparison in anthropology: the impossible method. xiv, 392 pp., figs, bibliogr. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 2018. £24.99 (paper). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 28(1), 378–379.

MLA Style

Gellner, DN. “Candea, Matei. Comparison in Anthropology: the Impossible Method. Xiv, 392 Pp., Figs, Bibliogr. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 2018. £24.99 (Paper).” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 28, no. 1, 2022, pp. 378–79.

Chicago Style

Gellner, DN. 2022. “Candea, Matei. Comparison in Anthropology: the Impossible Method. Xiv, 392 Pp., Figs, Bibliogr. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 2018. £24.99 (Paper).” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 28 (1): 378–79.
Print

Access Document

Files:: Gellner_2022_Candea_Matei_Comparison.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 52.9KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1111/1467-9655.13694

Authors

+ Gellner, DN More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: SSD
Department:: SAME
Oxford college:: All Souls College
Role:: Author
ORCID:: 0000-0001-5152-1680

Publisher:: Wiley
Journal:: Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute More from this journal
Volume:: 28
Issue:: 1
Pages:: 378-379
Publication date:: 2022-02-11
DOI:: 10.1111/1467-9655.13694
EISSN:: 1467-9655
ISSN:: 1359-0987

Language:: English
Subtype:: Review
Pubs id:: 1645565
Local pid:: pubs:1645565
Deposit date:: 2026-06-07
ARK identifier:: ark:/29072/ora_2ffde76bc5c94a928e8fbc46ea037db2

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Royal Anthropological Institute
Copyright date:: 2022
Rights statement:: © Royal Anthropological Institute 2022
Notes:: This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Wiley at https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13694

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP