Correspondence: systematic reviews do not always capture context of real-world intervention programmes for childhood obesity (response to Littlewood, et al., 2020 in BMC Public Health)

Journal article

In a recent issue of the BMC Public Health journal, Littlewood et al. described the results of a systematic review of interventions to prevent or treat childhood obesity in Māori or Pacific Island peoples. They found that studies to date have had limited impact on improving health outcomes for Māori and Pacific Island peoples, and suggest this may be due to a lack of co-design principles in the conception of the various studies. Ensuring that interventions are appropriate for groups most affected by obesity is critical; however, some inaccuracies should be noted in the explanation of these findings. There is a risk with systematic reviews that the context of intervention trials is lost without acknowledging the associated body of literature for programmes that refer to the ongoing commitment to communities and groups most affected by obesity.

Authors: Wild, CEK; Cave, TL; Willing, EJ; Derraik, JGB; Grant, CC

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: BioMed Central
• Journal: BMC Public Health
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 501-501
• Article number: 501
• Publication date: 2021-03-15
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10486-5
• EISSN: 1471-2458
• ISSN: 1471-2458
• Language: English
• Keywords: Pathology; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Childhood obesity; Overweight; Biostatistics; Gerontology; Environmental health; Nursing; Public health; MEDLINE; Public health interventions; Psychological intervention; Obesity; Context (archaeology); Systematic review; Medicine