Journal article
Randomized, controlled pilot trial of natural versus hormone replacement therapy cycles in frozen embryo replacement in vitro fertilization
- Abstract:
- OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is any difference between the outcomes of two standard treatment protocols for frozen embryo replacement (FER): natural and down-regulated hormone replacement treatment (HRT). DESIGN: Prospective, open, single-center, randomized, controlled pilot trial. SETTING: Private fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Women (n = 159) planning an FER cycle at the Oxford Fertility Unit, aged <40 years at the time their embryos were frozen; with at least one blastocyst or two cleavage-stage embryos in storage; regular ovulatory cycles; and at most two previous FER cycles. INTERVENTION(S): Eligible participants were recruited and randomized between March 2010 and July 2012 into one of two standard FER treatment groups: natural (n = 80) menstrual (Natural) or GnRH agonist/HRT (n = 79) cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate after replacement of frozen-thawed embryos, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and cycle cancellations. RESULT(S): A total of 159 women were randomized (80 Natural; 79 HRT), and 145 had ET and completed the study (72 Natural; 73 HRT). Pregnancy outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The live birth rates were 26.3% (Natural) and 31.7% (HRT) per randomized patient. Per ET/protocol the live birth rates were 29.2% and 34.2%. The implantation rates were 24.3% and 26.0%, and there were three twin births in the Natural and five in the HRT arms. CONCLUSION(S): The findings of this pilot study support the suggestion that for women with ovulatory cycles undergoing FER, the outcomes are similar between natural and HRT protocols. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00843570. Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 170.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1131
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Fertility and Sterility More from this journal
- Volume:
- 104
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 915-920.e1
- Publication date:
- 2015-08-05
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1556-5653
- ISSN:
-
0015-0282
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:539311
- UUID:
-
uuid:2eb61412-bc28-4874-81a0-482f9c05c5ad
- Local pid:
-
pubs:539311
- Source identifiers:
-
539311
- Deposit date:
-
2015-10-09
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- American Society for Reproductive Medicine
- Copyright date:
- 2015
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Published by Elsevier Inc. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1131
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record