Journal article
Optimising professional support for doctors who experience work performance issues: a realist evaluation
- Abstract:
-
Background
The optimal performance of doctors is critical to delivering high-quality, safe healthcare. However, 6–12% of doctors may experience challenges that impact their work performance. In many countries, including the UK, there is variation in the practice and quality of professional support services between different types of organisations. The aims of our study were (1) to identify why, how, in what contexts and for whom professional support works, (2) to develop a guide for healthcare organisations to use to optimise professional support.
Methods
We carried out a realist evaluation consistent with Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) II standards. 45 interviews were conducted with professional support staff and doctors who had undertaken professional support across seven sites in England. Interviews were analysed using a realist logic. To develop the guide, six workshops were held with the same groups plus a patient and public involvement group.
Results
We identified six principles of effective professional support, based on 47 context-mechanism-outcome configurations. (1) Work-place culture influences support-seeking behaviour. (2) Trust and psychological safety are central to enable candid conversations and engagement. (3) Doctors can then develop self-awareness and situational awareness, reframe challenges, accept responsibility where appropriate and recognise structural factors underpinning their difficulties. (4) Doctors are more likely to feel motivated to engage through positive framing. (5) Personal and professional growth occurs when doctors are empowered to make changes to their practice. (6) Cultures that stigmatise help-seeking undermine support, while those that model vulnerability and normalise support enhance the likelihood of positive outcomes.
Conclusions
Our guide provides step-by-step advice to identify key actions for those delivering professional support . Since the realist approach identifies principles and causal explanations, the findings are likely transferable to other settings/countries.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1.8MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019749
Authors
+ National Institute for Health and Care Research
More from this funder
- Funder identifier:
- https://ror.org/0187kwz08
- Grant:
- NIHR 130922
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Group
- Journal:
- BMJ Quality & Safety More from this journal
- Publication date:
- 2026-04-20
- Acceptance date:
- 2026-03-18
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2044-5423
- ISSN:
-
2044-5415
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
2409911
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2409911
- Source identifiers:
-
W7154990097
- Deposit date:
-
2026-04-21
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Brennan et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2026
- Rights statement:
- © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record