Journal article icon

Journal article

Optimising professional support for doctors who experience work performance issues: a realist evaluation

Abstract:
Background
The optimal performance of doctors is critical to delivering high-quality, safe healthcare. However, 6–12% of doctors may experience challenges that impact their work performance. In many countries, including the UK, there is variation in the practice and quality of professional support services between different types of organisations. The aims of our study were (1) to identify why, how, in what contexts and for whom professional support works, (2) to develop a guide for healthcare organisations to use to optimise professional support.
Methods
We carried out a realist evaluation consistent with Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) II standards. 45 interviews were conducted with professional support staff and doctors who had undertaken professional support across seven sites in England. Interviews were analysed using a realist logic. To develop the guide, six workshops were held with the same groups plus a patient and public involvement group.
Results
We identified six principles of effective professional support, based on 47 context-mechanism-outcome configurations. (1) Work-place culture influences support-seeking behaviour. (2) Trust and psychological safety are central to enable candid conversations and engagement. (3) Doctors can then develop self-awareness and situational awareness, reframe challenges, accept responsibility where appropriate and recognise structural factors underpinning their difficulties. (4) Doctors are more likely to feel motivated to engage through positive framing. (5) Personal and professional growth occurs when doctors are empowered to make changes to their practice. (6) Cultures that stigmatise help-seeking undermine support, while those that model vulnerability and normalise support enhance the likelihood of positive outcomes.
Conclusions
Our guide provides step-by-step advice to identify key actions for those delivering professional support . Since the realist approach identifies principles and causal explanations, the findings are likely transferable to other settings/countries.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019749

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2165-0155
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7661-9542
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-2135-6212
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-5384-4157
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-1433-9323


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/0187kwz08
Grant:
NIHR 130922


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
BMJ Quality & Safety More from this journal
Publication date:
2026-04-20
Acceptance date:
2026-03-18
DOI:
EISSN:
2044-5423
ISSN:
2044-5415


Language:
English
Pubs id:
2409911
Local pid:
pubs:2409911
Source identifiers:
W7154990097
Deposit date:
2026-04-21
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP