Journal article icon

Journal article

Cognitive behaviour therapy for nightmares for patients with persecutory delusions (Nites): an assessor-blind, pilot randomised controlled trial

Abstract:

Objective: Nightmares are relatively common in patients experiencing psychosis but rarely assessed or treated. Nightmares may maintain persecutory delusions by portraying fears in sensory-rich detail. We tested the potential benefits of imagery-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for nightmares on nightmare severity and persecutory delusions.

Method:This assessor-blind parallel-group pilot trial randomized 24 participants with nightmares and persecutory delusions to receive CBT for nightmares delivered over 4 weeks in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. Assessments were at 0, 4 (end of treatment), and 8 weeks (follow-up). Feasibility outcomes assessed therapy uptake, techniques used, satisfaction, and attrition. The primary efficacy outcome assessed nightmare severity at week 4. Analyses were intention to treat, estimating treatment effect with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: All participants offered CBT completed therapy (mean [SD], 4.8 [0.6] sessions) with high satisfaction, and 20 (83%) participants completed all assessments. Compared with TAU, CBT led to large improvements in nightmares (adjusted mean difference = −7.0; 95% CI, –12.6 to –1.3; d = –1.1) and insomnia (6.3; 95% CI, 2.6 to 10.0; d = 1.4) at week 4. Gains were maintained at follow-up. Suicidal ideation was not exacerbated by CBT but remained stable to follow-up, compared with TAU, which reduced at follow-up (6.8; 95% CI, 0.3 to 3.3; d = 0.7). CBT led to reductions in paranoia (–20.8; 95% CI, –43.2 to 1.7; d = –0.6), although CIs were wide. Three serious adverse events were deemed unrelated to participation (CBT = 2, TAU = 1).

Conclusions: CBT for nightmares is feasible and may be efficacious for treating nightmares and comorbid insomnia for patients with persecutory delusions. It shows promise on paranoia but potentially not on suicidal ideation.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1177/0706743719847422

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author


Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Journal:
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry More from this journal
Volume:
64
Issue:
10
Pages:
686 - 696
Publication date:
2019-05-26
Acceptance date:
2019-03-31
DOI:
ISSN:
1497-0015


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:987685
UUID:
uuid:2d8cd049-b2e9-4daf-bb6c-810d7ca44aa1
Local pid:
pubs:987685
Source identifiers:
987685
Deposit date:
2019-04-08
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP